<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 25 Best Blogs of 2009?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009</link>
	<description>served irregularly for your edification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 04:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: freeware forex charting tools</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/comment-page-1#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>freeware forex charting tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=484#comment-266</guid>
		<description>Hi Sir:
Great post. Gives me what I have been loiking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sir:<br />
Great post. Gives me what I have been loiking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly Bock</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/comment-page-1#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=484#comment-145</guid>
		<description>I Can Has Cheeseburger is the most ridiculous site ever. How it ever gets the attention it gets, I have no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Can Has Cheeseburger is the most ridiculous site ever. How it ever gets the attention it gets, I have no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Daily Kos as of February 18, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/comment-page-1#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Daily Kos as of February 18, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=484#comment-144</guid>
		<description>[...] Act is now on the air &#8230; more on the ad from the New York Times Caucus blog and Daily Kos .   25 Best Blogs of 2009? - agitationist.com 02/18/2009 Time Magazine (are we still calling it a “magazine”?) has posted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Act is now on the air &#8230; more on the ad from the New York Times Caucus blog and Daily Kos .   25 Best Blogs of 2009? &#8211; agitationist.com 02/18/2009 Time Magazine (are we still calling it a “magazine”?) has posted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=484#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I have no idea how Time makes an &quot;overrated list&quot; and Freakonomics doesn&#039;t end up on it. Easily the most eggheadedly boring blog I ever put in my google reader. They think they&#039;re jack-of-all-trades that can weigh in on any topic, but every time it was one I actually had some knowledge of the subject, it was clear they had no idea what they were talking about. That and many of their posts were simple, &quot;What do you people think?&quot;  Maybe that&#039;s OK on some blogs. Not when you&#039;re blogging for the New York Times. Sorry. Stepping off soapbox now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no idea how Time makes an &#8220;overrated list&#8221; and Freakonomics doesn&#8217;t end up on it. Easily the most eggheadedly boring blog I ever put in my google reader. They think they&#8217;re jack-of-all-trades that can weigh in on any topic, but every time it was one I actually had some knowledge of the subject, it was clear they had no idea what they were talking about. That and many of their posts were simple, &#8220;What do you people think?&#8221;  Maybe that&#8217;s OK on some blogs. Not when you&#8217;re blogging for the New York Times. Sorry. Stepping off soapbox now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
