So it’s a new year…have you forgotten anything?

Here’s a hint:

Ever see a site with a copyright statement 6 months out of date? Even big-shot corporate blogs make this mistake. But on a young, growing blog, it looks particularly bad.

Or perhaps you don’t have a copyright statement at all? Tsk tsk.

Why don’t we automate this, so we’ll never, ever have to think about it again? Here’s how to do it in WordPress:

1. Log in to WordPress, and go to Theme Editor.
2. Choose “footer.php”.
3. Delete your current copyright statement (if it exists), and insert the following code:&copy; 2008 – <?php echo date(Y); ?>…replacing “2008″ with the date you started your blog.
4. If you wish, put your name adjacent to the copyright, being sure not to disturb the php date tag. See mine below for an example.
5. Done.

Happy New Year! Anyone got a good detox recipe?

Today is the first anniversary of this blog. I’ve enjoyed it, I’ve ignored it, I’ve used and abused it. I thank you for the interaction, and the support. Now…I will be making some changes around here very shortly, and if you’ve been reading regularly or have subscribed, you may want to stop now.

After the surprising increase in traffic during my most recent Google Garbage™ experiment, I’ve decided for the time being to spend some of this blog’s precious PageRank on more such specious pursuits.

The fact is, posting a bunch of nonsense is good for business. I supposed the television networks figured this out decades ago, didn’t they?

Putting up posts on hot topics and/or “long-tail” niche keywords has made me a pretty nice little chunk of change over the past few months, here and elsewhere. Apparently this is how kids can make money these days. Since I don’t particularly have the time to do much else, that’s what I’ll be using this blog for, at least for the foreseeable future.

This is just to announce the change to the handful of readers who have stuck around through the garbage posts. If I have anything interesting to say or show, I’ll probably post it at my Tumblr blog.

Again, I suggest you unsubscribe and stop reading now, or you’ll find yourself reading about car radiator repair, rapid drug detox, natural snoring remedies, home surveillance cameras and Bowling Green State University.

Thanks all!

Why the absence? Fitting this blog into my time was daunting, especially for a perfectionist like me. I was spending 2 hours writing and re-writing posts other people would have finished in 20 minutes. From here on out, I’m setting a 1/2 hour rule. If it’s not done by then, I’m putting it aside and coming back to it.

Updating every day was too high a goal, although I kept it going for quite a while. I’ll go at it a little more modestly from here on out.

And finally, every post doesn’t need to be 500 words.

Nice to be back.

PageRank is one of the factors Google uses to determine how “important” a page is. This is key, since it needs a way to determine which results come up higher than others. For anyone in business on the web, this can translate directly into dollars, euros or shekels. For anyone else, it helps determine how much attention you get. Either way, it’s a big deal.

In essence, it’s a system of voting. When page A on the internet links to page B, it’s considered to have “voted” for it. So the page that gets the most votes wins, right? Well, not necessarily – for not all votes are created equal. A “vote” from a huge, important site is given much more weight than a vote from your grandmother’s blog. 

And what determines a huge, important site? It has more votes (links) to it, and/or those links themselves have more importance. But how are those links determined to be “important”? Start this paragraph over, and repeat endlessly.

Yes, it’s a very big, very complicated loop. Your PageRank is determined by the PageRank of the sites that link to yours, and theirs is determined by the PageRank of sites that link to them, and on and on, billions of times over.

But it gets even more complicated. Each of us only has a limited amount of PageRank to confer to others by way of links. If I link to you, my reservoir of outgoing PageRank is diminished by a small amount. If I link to 100 pages, each link is worth less than if I link to ten.

Now take it a step further down the rabbit hole. If the act of linking to you diminishes the power of the link I give you, how much is my link worth – its value before it existed, or after? And how can Google determine anyone’s PageRank until they’ve calculated everyone else’s PageRank? And how can they calculate those, until they’ve calculated all the others?

The answer is actually pretty mundane: Google just throws in a little “damping factor” and runs the calculations over and over until the difference in numbers gets so small as to be insignificant. Voila.

If you can stand some math, this is a fine explanation of the calculations involved, and this is a still-complex but slightly less math-oriented approach, which links to a very nice calculator you can use to estimate the effects of internal and external links on your own site.

After three months in existence, we’ve debuted with a PR 4. I’ve done little to no SEO on this site, no link-building, and wrote about what I knew (or at least had an opinion about).

Not bad at all. Cheers, big G.

The Internet Is About Freedom

March 22nd, 2009 

I was in a bit of shock when I saw that the top story on Techmeme was a post on TechCrunch entitled. “Why Advertising Is Failing On The Internet“. After all, TechCrunch is an ad-supported site–something I admittedly had to confirm using a browser without an ad blocker.

But my confusion subsided when I realize that the TechCrunch post was actually a guest post by Eric Clemons, Professor of Operations and Information Management at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

Here’s the outline:

1. There Must Be Something Other Than Advertising

2. Advertising will fail

3. Advertising will fail for three reasons:

• Consumers do not trust advertising.
• Consumers do not want to view advertising.
• Consumers do not need advertising.

4. Alternative models for monetization are available:

• Selling content and information.
• Selling experience and participation in a virtual community.
• Selling accessories for virtual communities.

In my case he’s preaching to the converted, and I don’t see why his arguments should be so controversial. But clearly they are in a world where the ad-supported model dominates to such an extent that most people don’t imagine any other business model is viable. I hope his post helps persuade a few skeptics.

Finally, I love his conclusion:

The internet is about freedom, and I suspect that a truly free population will not be held captive and forced to watch ads.  We always knew that freedom comes at a price; perhaps the price of internet freedom and the failure of ads will be paying a fair price for the content and the experience and the recommendations that we value.

This weekend I had already decided to remove the text ads from this site, and Daniel’s post this morning is a great example of serendipity, since he explains it all for me.

I would only add this: there’s nothing wrong with commerce or capitalism. I have a number of other sites specifically dedicated to selling things. But this site was intended to be informational and/or entertaining. And as such, there’s no reason for me to force ads down your throat. So I’ve decided to go all PBS on you.

But much like PBS, I will continue to shill for a connected service that actually contributes to this blog: my web host. So I’m leaving the little banner that promotes them. That seems reasonable, since it actually has something to do with this site, unlike the supposedly “relevant” text ads.

So there. Goodbye ads. You’ve annoyed me on other people’s sites, and you will no longer annoy other people on mine.

This morning I ran across this video of Matt at a conference discussing SEO, with a particular focus on Wordpress blogs. Though experienced SEOs should know most of this info, there will be something in here that is new to almost anyone, and beginners in particular will benefit.

And as a bonus, a more advanced talk from SEO pro Stephen Spencer on “SEO Mistakes Most Bloggers Make”:

If you’ve read this series thus far, you have one or more of what we’re calling “Google keywords” to target. Let’s take your top target, and start optimizing. This entry will consist of the absolute basics of on-page SEO, essential to search engine ranking.

There are two types of content we’ll be concerned with: that which is visible to the reader (the text on the page), and that which is invisible (the behind-the-scenes code that people don’t see, but that machines do). To tweak the code you’ll need to work with html or whatever software you’ve used to build your site.

The URL

Your web address may already be established, and out of your control. But if you are just choosing it now, try to include your entire primary keyword, preferably at the beginning of the URL. If your Google keywords are going to be “Italian sports cars”, try to get italiansportscars.com. Since that’s probably taken, start adding suffixes until you find one that’s available, e.g. italiansportscarsinfo.com. One or two hyphens are fine; four and up looks spammy. Use Nameboy Domain Name Generator to quickly generate ideas, and snag an available name quickly when you find a good one.

Page Title

Assuming we have the web site set up, we move on to tweaking the main page. The title of your main page should be your primary Google keywords – nothing more or less. It should be between ten and 60 characters, with no hyphens or other special characters. Don’t get fancy.

Description and Keyword Meta-tags

These are code elements, not seen by the user when browsing your site. You can set them in whatever software you use to build your site. They are not terribly important to Google, but they are to some other search engines. However, the description is often shown in your Google search results, so make it a reader-friendly pitch for your site. Sound informative, not salesman-like. Give a taste of your content; often the first couple of lines of the page work well.

The keyword tags are no longer relied upon by Google, but may affect your ranking in other engines. Just put in your primary Google keywords phrase, and nothing else. Humans won’t see this.

Keyword Density

Probably the most important on-page SEO factor is keyword density. This means what percentage of your text is actually made up of your Google keywords. Too little, and the page won’t seem relevant to the topic. Too much, and you’ll be seen as a spammer, as I apparently was (an update on the site referred to in that link: using the techniques on this page, I’ve moved the site back up from number 107 to number 10).

Use your keywords as naturally as possible, but fit them in somehow. The goal is generally considered to be from three to seven percent of your text. You can check this on the fly using this plug-in for Firefox. Simply highlight the keywords, and use the contextual menu to “Check Keyword Density”. I like to shoot for five percent of the body text. This plug-in will also let you know if you’ve achieved some of the other goals on this page.

H1, H2 and H3 tags

These are text formatting “headline” tags (of descending importance), so Google believes they imply relevance. Without too much explanation, the best advice for most pages is to place your keyword phrase near the top of your page, enclosed in H2 tags. It will be seen by the reader as a medium-sized headline, so make sure it works with your design. Don’t use H1, or Google will once again think you’re trying to game them.

Speaking of design, this is a good place to point out that text contained in graphics are invisible to search engines. The robots read your page as text-only. So you can have your keywords a foot long across the top of your page, but if they’re contained in an image, they might as well not be there. Set the “alt” tag of the image to whatever the text says, but don’t rely on that as a replacement. The H2 headline is your best bet.

Font Styles

The first couple of mentions of your Google keywords within the text should be in bold or italic. This lets Google know they are an important element of your content. Make sure this doesn’t look silly on the page. Look at it as if you were a reader, and make it fit in.

Order and Proximity

Multi-word keywords should be in exact order, without other words in between. You can get some secondary Google juice from slightly-rephrased versions (e.g. “Italian made sports cars”), but the main goal is to get them in order and next to each other.

Anchor Text

Anchor is a fancy word for “link”. If you link to a page on the same subject (especially one within your own site, which is highly recommended), the text the reader sees should be your keyword or a close variation. Google thinks this means the page is on-topic. A page on “Italian sports cars” that has links to “office furniture” looks suspicious to them.

For internal links, try to make sure the page you link to actually has the keyword in its address. If you have the Google keywords in your domain name, you’re set. Otherwise try to get it in the page address, like http://example.com/italiansportscars.html.

As for external links, we’ll cover that in a future post, but a few bits of advice: try to link only to quality, non-spammy sites. Don’t participate in link-trading schemes. You can trade links with friends and associates, but bad-quality or off-topic links can make you look bad to Google. Keep your links constant – Google doesn’t like “link churn”, or constantly changing links. Don’t ever link to link-trading, free-for-all link type sites. Nor should you pursue incoming links from these sites. Google sees these as “bad neighborhoods” and will think less of you. Finally: never pay for a link. Just don’t do it.

Site Structure

Try to structure your site so that you can reach any page in only two clicks. Anything buried deeper than that will be considered less important, both by readers and by Google.

File Size

Keep the entire page under 100k. If you’re using images, compress them as much as reasonably possible for a fast loading page. Again, this is good in terms of both Google and the reader. If necessary, remove images. Yes, I know it hurts.

There are many other tips to be had, but these are the essentials. Do everything here, and you’ll be in good shape to start with off-page SEO, which is a topic for another day…

And everyone knows what a wiki is for: letting anyone contribute, right?

Well, not necessarily. A wiki engine (the software used to create and run wikis like Wikipedia) doesn’t actually care if you use it to make a “proper” wiki or not. 

In fact, since wiki engines allow some users access to edit pages and stop others, what if you only allowed yourself access? Do you then still have a wiki? Or just a really easy-to-edit web site? One that you can edit from anywhere you can get to the internet?

But what about the plain-vanilla wiki look? What about the history/revision links, last edit information, and all the other clues that the user is looking at a wiki engine? 

Enter our friend the CSS stylesheet, and one of our favorite commands,

{display:none;}

Voila! Restrict access and hide the wiki features, and you have an easy-to-edit, open-source-powered web site. A few examples:

http://www.yanb.be
http://www.ifccc.org
http://nitens.org/taraborelli

OK, so they still look pretty plain, but they certainly don’t look like wikis. And with some CSS trickery, they can look like anything you want.

A wiki engine is simply that: an engine. And like any engine, it provides power; what you do with it is only limited by your ideas.

Here’s a quick tutorial to get started (specifically using the Wikka engine, but the concepts involved will work with most others):

http://docs.wikkawiki.org/InvisibleWiki

And a quick video tutorial:

How to run an invisible wiki from AcademicProductivity on Vimeo

Let me share the story of a site I built recently. I had settled on a particularly good phrase for my Google keywords. Google’s top results were weak – the top ten all had low PageRanks (for background on PageRank see here). I acquired a domain name consisting entirely of this phrase. I set up my site to be optimized for it. I wrote the content, and squeezed in my Google keywords everywhere I reasonably could, without making the content appear spammy. Everything was set.

Under normal circumstances, I would expect to wait several months to see decent search engine results. After all, the domain was brand new, the site was starting out from square one, its PageRank was beginning from zero, and there were no other sites linking to mine. And all of those factors are negatives to Google. All I was starting with was a good domain, and a site that was highly targeted. I submitted my site to Google and waited.

In a few days, I checked how I was ranking for my keywords (you can do this with a site like this, or this Firefox plug-in). I was shocked to see that, despite everything going against me, I ranked number 17 on my very first indexing. This was an amazing result. With a few more pages of content and a few incoming links, getting into the top ten seemed like a sure thing. Number one was even within reach.

I got back to work on the site, being careful not to upset the balance I had established, and got ready to celebrate. In a few more days, I checked again to see how much better I was ranking.

The site had dropped from number 17 to number 107.

So what happened? I had over-optimized. Or to use the less graceful term, I was guilty of “keyword stuffing”. Keyword stuffing, simply put, means using your targeted Google keywords too many times. Google’s algorithms are designed to reward pages that focus on something specific, but also to punish anyone who might put up a page stuffed full of the same words just to achieve good position in their results. And I had apparently crossed the line – though interestingly, it took them a second pass to notice.

So where is the line? If anyone claims to know, they are lying (unless perhaps they work for Google, but Google guards their algorithms like the formula for Coke). However, it has been that the optimum keyword density is somewhere between three and seven percent. That is to say, your keywords make up no more than that portion of your content. You can check your keyword density with many different tools (just Google “keyword density“).

In my case, the various tools agreed that my Google keywords had a density of around 15%, making me look to Google like a medium-grade search engine spammer, and I was automatically penalized.

Although every use of my keywords was justified, and my writing included them gracefully, Google’s robots didn’t care. And there’s today’s lesson. You are writing for both people and computers. Be careful not to annoy either one of them, or you’ll be ignored by both.

I’ll report back as I make progress in clawing my way back up.