<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Agitationist &#187; branding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agitationist.com/tag/branding/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agitationist.com</link>
	<description>served irregularly for your edification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How to Get a One Word Domain Name</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/how-to-get-a-one-word-domain-name</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/how-to-get-a-one-word-domain-name#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 10:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neologisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonsense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloglabs.net/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


All the one word domain names are gone.
After an hour or two of searching, you&#8217;ve come to that conclusion. There is no meaningful English word that hasn&#8217;t already been registered.
Well, you&#8217;re right. Give up now.
Unless you can embrace the concept of nonsense. In which case, great one word names are right there, waiting for you to pluck [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="ectocontent">
<div>
<p><strong>All the one word domain names are gone.</strong></p>
<p>After an hour or two of searching, you&#8217;ve come to that conclusion. There is no meaningful English word that hasn&#8217;t already been registered.</p>
<p>Well, you&#8217;re right. Give up now.</p>
<p>Unless you can embrace the concept of <strong>nonsense</strong>. In which case, great <span>one word names are right there</span>, waiting for you to pluck them off the tree. They&#8217;re screaming at you: &#8220;Pick me! Pick me!&#8221;</p>
<p>First of we&#8217;re assuming that the generic names for your project (let&#8217;s say shoes.com and shoes.net) are already taken. If not, buy them, and then please buy me a lottery ticket.</p>
<p>OK, now that we&#8217;re back in the real world, how about zazzer.com? Blastora? Quiklit?</p>
<p>&#8220;But, but, but&#8230;<strong>those don&#8217;t</strong> <em><strong>mean</strong></em> <strong>anything!</strong>&#8221; you protest. Stick with me here.</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://2008.thenextweb.com/startups/" target="_blank">this list</a> of recent startups. Most of them look like the product of a child on Ritalin with a bowl of alphabet soup. <a href="http://wakoopa.com/" target="_blank">Wakoopa</a>? <a href="http://twingly.com/" target="_blank">Twingly</a>? <a href="http://hoera.com/" target="_blank">Hoera</a>? <a href="http://zilok.com/" target="_blank">Zilok</a>? <a href="http://symbaloo.com/" target="_blank">Symbaloo</a>? If those names don&#8217;t immediately lower your IQ, at least they should make you feel a whole lot better about <em>your</em> ideas.</p>
<p>Yes, they&#8217;re meaningless, but only because they don&#8217;t mean anything <em>yet</em>. If you <em><span>believe</span></em> it&#8217;s a word, <em>it is </em>a word.<strong> </strong>After all, language is only language because we collectively agree on its meaning.</p>
<p>So <strong>when is a name a name?</strong> When people recognize it. If I want to be called Zorak, I just need <em>you</em> to call me Zorak. Likewise, if we all say Flickr is spelled without an &#8220;e&#8221;, well then it is. Post-Flickr, dropping the final vowel quickly became a formula: Tumblr, Raptr, Feedalizr (Twitter didn&#8217;t get the memo). Success is always imitated, formulized, and then clichéd. But <span>someone has to jump first.</span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-weight: normal;">If it expresses something, evokes something or just</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> sounds good to your ear, </span><span><span style="font-weight: normal;">then</span> <span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>it works</em></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><em>.</em></span></span></p>
<p><span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Likewise, if we </span><em><span style="font-weight: normal;">believe</span></em><span style="font-weight: normal;"> that a name-number compound makes sense, </span><em><span><span style="font-weight: normal;">it does</span></span></em><span style="font-weight: normal;">. Especially with </span><strong><span><span style="font-weight: normal;">a meaningful or witty backstory</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;">.</span></strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"> </span><a href="http://30gms.com/" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;">30gms.com</span></a><span style="font-weight: normal;"> is the web site of a firm called Fibre, of which 30 grams happens to be the recommended dose. Clever, huh?</span></span></p>
<p>Although that number-noun formula is overused at this point, it demonstrates a key naming principle of our time: <strong>enigma is the new familiarity.</strong> Names like &#8220;Thunderbird&#8221; and &#8220;Zenith&#8221; were supposed to imbue products with the qualities of their namesakes. Those days are gone. Names no longer define products; <em>products define their names</em>.</p>
<p>And although shoes.com may have automatic traffic for life, zapatoo.com or 12toes.com are more memorable and <em>more brandable.</em> When the brain hears something unique that it doesn&#8217;t quite understand, it latches on and won&#8217;t let go.</p>
<p>After all, <span>branding is</span> <em>differentiation.</em> <strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">And isn&#8217;t nonsense i</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">s</span></span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> about as different as it gets?</span></strong></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/how-to-get-a-one-word-domain-name/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->