Blogging, SEO, web trends, google keywords and other geeky stuff.

25 Best Blogs of 2009?

Posted: February 18th, 2009 | Author: Agitationist | Filed under: blogging | Tags: , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Time Magazine (are we still calling it a “magazine”?) has posted “Best Blogs 2009“, their second annual list of the “best blogs in the world”. A few notes before we dig in to their choices:

  • It is currently mid-February. It might be a good idea to wait until December is a bit closer before making our “best of” lists.
  • By various counts, there are at least 200 million blogs in the world. Either Time spent an incredible amount of time and effort on this, or…well, they didn’t. The fact that most of their choices can be found on Technorati’s list of the most popular blogs would suggest the latter.
  • Though a list of 25 items could easily fit on one page, Time puts each and very entry on a separate page. This is designed to get 25 clicks and 25 page-views from every reader, inflating Time’s perceived popularity. It’s actually pretty smart, but also rather annoying to the reader.
  • This is basically their version of linkbait – the method used by bloggers to get others to link to their posts (as I did above), increasing their rankings in Google. Lists are the most common form of this technique – anytime you see a blog post starting with a number (“25 best ____”, 5 Ways To ____”, “10 New ____”), you’re looking at linkbait. Including when I do it.
  • Time’s post also incorporates two other well-known forms of linkbait: the “useful” post, and the “controversial” post. Casual readers will be attracted to it as a useful list, tech-savvy types will be complaining all day about it on their blogs – as I am doing now. See how it works?

As a kicker, in case they didn’t generate enough controversy, there’s a list of the 5 Most Overrated Blogs, sure to get a few more people ticked off, and generate five more page-views per reader.

Oddly enough, Gawker.com went from last year’s “best” to this year’s “most overrated”. Apparently in 2008 “Gawker’s relentlessly critical, headache-inducing cynicism” was a good thing, but in 2009 “the economic downturn and the near-collapse of Wall Street has made Gawker’s snarky worldview seem not only cruel but pointless.”

Oh, Time. The zeitgeist is getting sore from you having your finger on it.

As a service to you the reader, and because my annoyance knows no bounds, I present here Time’s lists on one page. The only value Time adds for your clicks is a screenshot of each, and a short paragraph seemingly written by someone on the way to work.

Time’s 25 Best Blogs 2009:

  1. Talking Points Memo
  2. The Huffington Post (down from #1 last year. Perhaps it was that little plagiarism problem.)
  3. Lifehacker
  4. Metafilter
  5. The Daily Dish
  6. Freakonomics
  7. BoingBoing
  8. Got2BeGreen
  9. Zen Habits
  10. The Conscience of a Liberal: Paul Krugman
  11. Crooks and Liars
  12. Generación Y
  13. Mashable
  14. Slashfood (“Slashfood is food for thought”…ugh. Didn’t they teach you about lazy writing in journalism school?)
  15. Official Google Blog
  16. synthesis (the choices are getting a bit better – this is a pretty thoughtful, interesting one)
  17. bleat (a “pop culture ephemera” blog – not bad, but much like 100,000 others)
  18. /Film
  19. Seth Godin’s Blog (bleh. Self-important aphorisms daily from a self-proclaimed web guru, followed by slobbering fanboy comments. No thanks.)
  20. Deadspin: Sports News
  21. Dooce (riding out her micro-fame. I don’t care about your OB-GYN visit, really.)
  22. Confessions of a Pioneer Woman (they had blogs on the frontier?)
  23. Said the Gramophone (how did they choose one mp3 blog?)
  24. Detention Slip (something about education apparently)
  25. Bad Astronomy
For the record, the most overrated were TechCrunch, Gawker, Jim Cramer, Perez Hilton (OK, we can all agree on that), and Daily Kos. “With the Bush years now just a memory, Kos’s blog has lost its mission,” according to Time.

Hey Time, what was your mission again?

Bookmark and Share

101 Web/Business Clichés That Must Die in 2009

Posted: January 2nd, 2009 | Author: Agitationist | Filed under: buzzwords | Tags: , , , , , , | 9 Comments »

Ready for one more new year’s resolution? Here are 101 web/tech/marketing/business words and phrases not to use in 2009. First, the prime offenders of 2008:

  • Web 2.0
  • Game-changer
  • Tipping Point
  • Outlier
  • Agile
  • Monetize
  • Tribes
  • Cloud computing
  • Webinar
  • Tweet
  • _______ Rock star, e.g “ActionScript Rock Star Needed!”
  • Perfect Storm
  • Next-generation
  • Space, e.g. “the ______ space”
  • Domain hacks, e.g. del.icio.us
  • Beta
  • Clarity
  • Enterprise, i.e. the company
  • Solution, i.e. whatever we can sell
  • Around, e.g “clarity around our enterprise solution”
  • Best practices/______-compliant
  • Mission statement
  • Transparency
  • Software as a Service
  • Scalable/extensible/robust
  • Change agent
  • Green/eco-/sustainable/environmentally friendly/carbon footprint
  • Bubble
  • Strategic/tactical
  • Engage/reach out
  • Dialogue/narrative
  • Widget
  • Meme
  • Status update
  • Social media marketing
  • Mobile social networking
  • Personal branding
  • Mashup
  • Micro-anything , e.g micro-funding, micro-blogging
  • Crowd-sourcing

And some oldies that need to die a quick, painless death already:

Touch base, proactive, Six Sigma, viral, stakeholders, circle back, take this offline, ROI, macro-, at the end of the day, outside of the box, low-hanging fruit, 110%, 24/7, reach out, corporate DNA, take it to the next level, manage expectations, throw him under the bus, top of mind, push-back, on message, bring to the table, step up, it is what it is, “having said that”, sound bite, bailout, come together, pay it forward, mission critical, turnkey, user-friendly, well-positioned, leverage, drink the Kool-Aid, my two cents, closure, due diligence, back in the day, go-to, meltdown, grow your business, high-level overview, win-win, going forward, value-added, 80/20, core competency, A-game, drop the ball, best of breed, in the pipeline.

OK, time to throw you under the bus. What clichés would you like like to ban in 2009?

Bookmark and Share

Corporate Blogs Aren’t Trusted: Forrester Research

Posted: December 31st, 2008 | Author: Agitationist | Filed under: blogging | Tags: , , , | 8 Comments »

Do you hear that? It’s the sound of a crowd of marketers, strategists, consultants, PR flacks and “social media gurus” scrambling for cover.

December 10th report from Forrester Research is making some people very uncomfortable. And it confirms everything I learned about corporate blogs as a media strategist.

(click to view)

(click for full size)

According to the report, only 16% of consumers who have read corporate blogs consider them trustworthy. That puts them below all other information sources, including wikis, online classifieds, message boards, even direct mail.

Dead last. More people would trust a random stranger to do an appendectomy than take advice from a corporate blog, no matter how cute or clever.

But of course, as Josh Bernhoff from Forrester notes, Everybody thinks their blog is an exception.”

To which might be added, “everyone thinks they are of above-average intelligence”.

So what advice are the pros giving?

Debbie Weil, the author of The Corporate Blogging Book, takes the “I’ve been telling you this all along” approach, stating:

I wish more corporate types wading into social media would read my book ($6.49 on Amazon). Especially Chapter 7 on how to write an effective corporate blog.

Keep making lemons, Debbie. Keep making lemons.

Meanwhile, the Blog Council - there’s a Blog Council? – exercises their irony muscles (emphasis added):

What’s clear is that while there is a lot of work still to do, corporate blogs do work. The report specifically highlighted some examples of corporate blogs that are trustworthy — DellRubbermaid, and Microsoft (all Blog Council members, by the way) — because they put their customer first and exist to help solve their problems.

The Blog Council: building trust in their own blog by shilling for their members. Well done.

Max Kalehoff, marketing VP at Clickable, states Forrester “gets it wrong”, because:

While the data selected to base the report are great for generating a headline, they’re mostly irrelevant. Blogs are a both a communications channel AND a medium.

[...]

Here’s an analogy: Do you trust telephones? No. But you may eventually build trust with the people with whom you talk and do business with via the telephone.

You’re right, Max: people don’t trust telephones. That’s why they invented Caller ID.  So we could screen out untrusted sources…like, say, your clients.

So basically the responses have been: “it’s the wrong question” or “it’s a flawed study” or “that’s not us”.

That’s fine for an academic circle-jerk debate amongst marketers and strategists. But in this economy, this report could actually cost some people their livelihoods. As such, it should be taken seriously.

So what’s a corporate blog/social media team to do?

Well, for a start:

  • Don’t force (or allow) your writers to recycle press releases. Let the people you hired to be creative be creative.
  • Start offering something anything of value. 
  • Question why you’ve got a blog in the first place, and if the answer is “because we have to”, put someone else in charge. 
  • Have enough guts to tell the Chief X Officer that they just don’t get this stuff
  • Explain that always being in sales mode doesn’t work in this medium. The company is not paying by the inch or the minute.
  • Challenge corporate insularity. Solicit contributions and feedback (positive and negative) from real people, and value it when you get it.
  • Explain the concept of institutional mistrust to the hand that feeds you.

If you get fired for it, start a blog, tell your story, publish your cease-and-desist letters, get a publicist, and start a consulting firm.

Either way, you win.

Bookmark and Share