<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Agitationist &#187; corporate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agitationist.com/tag/corporate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agitationist.com</link>
	<description>served irregularly for your edification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>25 Best Blogs of 2009?</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro-fame]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul-crushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Magazine (are we still calling it a &#8220;magazine&#8221;?) has posted &#8220;Best Blogs 2009&#8220;, their second annual list of the &#8220;best blogs in the world&#8221;. A few notes before we dig in to their choices:

It is currently mid-February. It might be a good idea to wait until December is a bit closer before making our [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time Magazine (are we still calling it a &#8220;magazine&#8221;?) has posted &#8220;<a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1879276_1879279,00.html" target="_blank">Best Blogs 2009</a>&#8220;, their second annual list of the &#8220;best blogs in the world&#8221;. A few notes before we dig in to their choices:</p>
<ul>
<li>It is currently mid-February. It might be a good idea to wait until December is a bit closer before making our &#8220;best of&#8221; lists.</li>
<li>By various counts, there are at least 200 million blogs in the world. Either Time spent an incredible amount of time and effort on this, or&#8230;well, they didn&#8217;t. The fact that most of their choices can be found on Technorati&#8217;s list of the most popular blogs would suggest the latter.</li>
<li>Though a list of 25 items could easily fit on one page, Time puts each and very entry on a separate page. This is designed to get 25 clicks and 25 page-views from every reader, inflating Time&#8217;s perceived popularity. It&#8217;s actually pretty smart, but also rather annoying to the reader.</li>
<li>This is basically their version of linkbait &#8211; the method used by bloggers to get others to link to their posts (as I did above), increasing their rankings in Google. Lists are the most common form of this technique &#8211; anytime you see a blog post starting with a number (&#8220;25 best ____&#8221;, 5 Ways To ____&#8221;, &#8220;10 New ____&#8221;), you&#8217;re looking at linkbait. Including when I do it.</li>
<li>Time&#8217;s post also incorporates two other well-known forms of linkbait: the &#8220;useful&#8221; post, and the &#8220;controversial&#8221; post. Casual readers will be attracted to it as a useful list, tech-savvy types will be complaining all day about it on their blogs &#8211; as I am doing now. See how it works?</li>
</ul>
<p>As a kicker, in case they didn&#8217;t generate enough controversy, there&#8217;s a list of the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1725323_1727645,00.html">5 Most Overrated Blogs</a>, sure to get a few more people ticked off, and generate five more page-views per reader.</p>
<p>Oddly enough, Gawker.com went from last year&#8217;s &#8220;best&#8221; to this year&#8217;s &#8220;most overrated&#8221;. Apparently in 2008 &#8220;Gawker&#8217;s relentlessly critical, headache-inducing cynicism&#8221; was a good thing, but in 2009 &#8220;the economic downturn and the near-collapse of Wall Street has made Gawker&#8217;s snarky worldview seem not only cruel but pointless.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, Time. The zeitgeist is getting sore from you having your finger on it.</p>
<p>As a service to you the reader, and because my annoyance knows no bounds, I present here Time&#8217;s lists on one page. The only value Time adds for your clicks is a screenshot of each, and a short paragraph seemingly written by someone on the way to work.</p>
<p>Time&#8217;s 25 Best Blogs 2009:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Talking Points Memo</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Huffington Post</strong> (down from #1 last year. Perhaps it was <a href="http://blogs.chicagoreader.com/chicagoland/2008/12/18/grand-theft-huffpo/" target="_blank">that little plagiarism problem</a>.)</li>
<li><strong>Lifehacker</strong></li>
<li><strong>Metafilter</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Daily Dish</strong></li>
<li><strong>Freakonomics</strong></li>
<li><strong>BoingBoing</strong></li>
<li><strong>Got2BeGreen</strong></li>
<li><strong>Zen Habits</strong></li>
<li><strong>The Conscience of a Liberal: Paul Krugman</strong></li>
<li><strong>Crooks and Liars</strong></li>
<li><strong>Generación Y</strong></li>
<li><strong>Mashable</strong></li>
<li><strong>Slashfood (&#8220;</strong>Slashfood is food for thought&#8221;&#8230;ugh. Didn&#8217;t they teach you about lazy writing in journalism school?)</li>
<li><strong>Official Google Blog</strong></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://interacc.typepad.com/" target="_blank">synthesis</a></strong> (the choices are getting a bit better &#8211; this is a pretty thoughtful, interesting one)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://lileks.com/bleat" target="_blank">bleat</a></strong> (a &#8220;pop culture ephemera&#8221; blog &#8211; not bad, but much like 100,000 others)</li>
<li><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/" target="_blank">/Film</a></strong><br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;"><strong>Seth Godin&#8217;s Blog <span style="font-weight: normal;">(bleh. Self-important aphorisms daily from a self-proclaimed web guru, followed by slobbering fanboy comments. No thanks.)</span></strong><br style="text-decoration: underline;" /></span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: arial; line-height: normal;"><strong>Deadspin: Sports News</strong><br />
</span></li>
<li><strong>Dooce <span style="font-weight: normal;">(riding out her micro-fame. I don&#8217;t care about your OB-GYN visit, really.)</span><br />
</strong></li>
<li><strong>Confessions of a Pioneer Woman <span style="font-weight: normal;">(they had blogs on the frontier?)</span><br />
</strong></li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.saidthegramophone.com/" target="_blank">Said the Gramophone</a></strong> (how did they choose <em>one</em> mp3 blog?)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.detentionslip.org/" target="_blank">Detention Slip</a></strong> (something about education apparently)</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy" target="_blank">Bad Astronomy</a></strong></li>
</ol>
<div>
For the record, the most overrated were TechCrunch, Gawker, Jim Cramer, Perez Hilton (OK, we can all agree on that), and Daily Kos. &#8220;With the Bush years now just a memory, Kos&#8217;s blog has lost its mission,&#8221; according to Time.</div>
<p>Hey Time, what was <em>your</em> mission again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/25-best-blogs-of-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>101 Web/Business Clichés That Must Die in 2009</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/101-web-business-cliches-that-must-die-in-2009</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/101-web-business-cliches-that-must-die-in-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 07:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[buzzwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neologisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul-crushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Ready for one more new year&#8217;s resolution? Here are 101 web/tech/marketing/business words and phrases not to use in 2009. First, the prime offenders of 2008:

Web 2.0
Game-changer
Tipping Point
Outlier
Agile
Monetize
Tribes
Cloud computing
Webinar
Tweet
_______ Rock star, e.g &#8220;ActionScript Rock Star Needed!&#8221;
Perfect Storm
Next-generation
Space, e.g. &#8220;the ______ space&#8221;
Domain hacks, e.g. del.icio.us
Beta
Clarity
Enterprise, i.e. the company
Solution, i.e. whatever we can sell
Around, e.g &#8220;clarity around our enterprise [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="ectocontent">
<p>Ready for one more new year&#8217;s resolution? Here are 101 web/tech/marketing/business words and phrases not to use in 2009. First, <strong>the prime offenders of 2008</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li>Web 2.0</li>
<li>Game-changer</li>
<li>Tipping Point</li>
<li>Outlier</li>
<li>Agile</li>
<li>Monetize</li>
<li>Tribes</li>
<li>Cloud computing</li>
<li>Webinar</li>
<li>Tweet</li>
<li>_______ Rock star, e.g &#8220;ActionScript Rock Star Needed!&#8221;</li>
<li>Perfect Storm</li>
<li>Next-generation</li>
<li>Space, e.g. &#8220;the ______ space&#8221;</li>
<li>Domain hacks, e.g. del.icio.us</li>
<li>Beta</li>
<li>Clarity</li>
<li>Enterprise, i.e. the company</li>
<li>Solution, i.e. whatever we can sell</li>
<li>Around, e.g &#8220;clarity around our enterprise solution&#8221;</li>
<li>Best practices/______-compliant</li>
<li>Mission statement</li>
<li>Transparency</li>
<li>Software as a Service</li>
<li>Scalable/extensible/robust</li>
<li>Change agent</li>
<li>Green/eco-/sustainable/environmentally friendly/carbon footprint</li>
<li>Bubble</li>
<li>Strategic/tactical</li>
<li>Engage/reach out</li>
<li>Dialogue/narrative</li>
<li>Widget</li>
<li>Meme</li>
<li>Status update</li>
<li>Social media marketing</li>
<li>Mobile social networking</li>
<li>Personal branding</li>
<li>Mashup</li>
<li>Micro-anything , e.g micro-funding, micro-blogging</li>
<li>Crowd-sourcing</li>
</ul>
<p>And some oldies that need to die a <strong>quick, painless death</strong> already:</p>
<p>Touch base, proactive, Six Sigma, viral, stakeholders, circle back, take this offline, ROI, macro-, at the end of the day, outside of the box, low-hanging fruit, 110%, 24/7, reach out, corporate DNA, take it to the next level, manage expectations, throw him under the bus, top of mind, push-back, on message, bring to the table, step up, it is what it is, &#8220;having said that&#8221;, sound bite, bailout, come together, pay it forward, mission critical, turnkey, user-friendly, well-positioned, leverage, drink the Kool-Aid, my two cents, closure, due diligence, back in the day, go-to, meltdown, grow your business, high-level overview, win-win, going forward, value-added, 80/20, core competency, A-game, drop the ball, best of breed, in the pipeline.</p>
<p>OK, time to throw <em><strong>you</strong></em> under the bus. What clichés would you like like to ban in 2009?</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/101-web-business-cliches-that-must-die-in-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Blogs Aren&#8217;t Trusted: Forrester Research</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Do you hear that? It&#8217;s the sound of a crowd of marketers, strategists, consultants, PR flacks and &#8220;social media gurus&#8221; scrambling for cover.
A December 10th report from Forrester Research is making some people very uncomfortable. And it confirms everything I learned about corporate blogs as a media strategist.
According to the report, only 16% of consumers who have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div id="ectocontent">
<div>
<p>Do you hear that? It&#8217;s the sound of a crowd of marketers, strategists, consultants, PR flacks and &#8220;social media gurus&#8221; <strong>scrambling for cover</strong>.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://blogs.forrester.com/groundswell/2008/12/people-dont-tru.html" target="_blank">December 10th report</a> from Forrester Research is making some people very uncomfortable. And it confirms everything I learned about corporate blogs as a media strategist.</p>
<div id="attachment_105" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/forrester_corp_blog_trust.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="size-medium wp-image-105 " title="forrester_corp_blog_trust" src="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/forrester_corp_blog_trust-300x268.jpg" alt="(click to view)" width="300" height="268" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(click for full size)</p></div>
<p>According to the report, only 16% of consumers who have read corporate blogs consider them trustworthy. That puts them <strong>below all other information sources</strong>, including wikis, online classifieds, message boards, even <em>direct mail</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Dead last</strong>. More people would trust a random stranger to do an appendectomy than take advice from a corporate blog, no matter how cute or clever.</p>
<p>But of course, as Josh Bernhoff from Forrester notes, <span>“<strong>Everybody thinks their blog is an exception</strong>.”</span></p>
<p><span>To which might be added, &#8220;everyone thinks they are of above-average intelligence&#8221;.</span></p>
<p>So what advice are the pros giving?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.debbieweil.com/blog/no-news-here-forrester-says-consumers-dont-trust-corporate-blogs/" target="_blank">Debbie Weil</a>, the author of <em>The Corporate Blogging Book</em>, takes the &#8220;I&#8217;ve been telling you this all along&#8221; approach, stating:</p>
<blockquote><p>I wish more corporate types wading into social media would read my <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Corporate-Blogging-Book-Absolutely-Everything">book</a> ($6.49 on Amazon). Especially Chapter 7 on how to write an effective corporate blog.</p></blockquote>
<p>Keep making lemons, Debbie. <em>Keep making lemons</em>.</p>
<p><span>Meanwhile, the <a href="http://blogcouncil.org/blog/here-are-a-few-trustworthy-corporate-blogs/" target="_blank">Blog Council</a> - there&#8217;s a Blog Council? &#8211; exercises their irony muscles (emphasis added):</span></p>
<blockquote><p>What’s clear is that while there is a lot of work still to do, corporate blogs do work. The report specifically highlighted some examples of corporate blogs that are trustworthy — <a href="http://www.direct2dell.com/" target="_blank">Dell</a>, <a href="http://blog.rubbermaid.com/" target="_blank">Rubbermaid</a>, and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/communities/blogs/portalhome.mspx" target="_blank">Microsoft</a> (<strong><em>all</em></strong> <strong><em>Blog Council members</em></strong><strong><em>, by the way</em></strong>) — because they put their customer first and exist to help solve their problems.</p></blockquote>
<p><span><span>The Blog Council: building trust in their own blog by shilling for their members. Well done.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span> <span><a href="http://www.attentionmax.com/blog/2008/12/forrester_research_gets_it_wrong_by_saying_corporate_blogs_arent_trusted.php" target="_blank">Max Kalehoff</a>, marketing VP at Clickable, states Forrester &#8220;gets it wrong&#8221;, because:</span><br />
</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>While the data selected to base the report are great for generating a headline, they’re mostly irrelevant. Blogs are a both a communications channel AND a medium.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>Here’s an analogy: Do you trust telephones? No. But you may eventually build trust with the people with whom you talk and do business with via the telephone.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re right, Max: people don&#8217;t trust telephones. <strong>That&#8217;s why they invented Caller ID.<span style="font-weight: normal;">  So we could screen out untrusted sources&#8230;like, say, <em>your clients</em>.</span></strong></p>
<p><span>So basically the responses have been: &#8220;it&#8217;s the wrong question&#8221; or &#8220;it&#8217;s a flawed study&#8221; or &#8220;that&#8217;s not us&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><span>That&#8217;s fine for an academic circle-jerk debate amongst marketers and strategists. But in this economy, this report could actually cost some people their livelihoods. As such,<strong> it should be taken seriously</strong>.</span></p>
<p><span>So what&#8217;s a corporate blog/social media team to do?</span></p>
<p><span>Well, for a start: </span></p>
<ul>
<li>Don&#8217;t force (or allow) your writers to recycle press releases. Let the people you hired to be creative <strong>be creative</strong>.</li>
<li>Start offering <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">something</span> <em>anything</em> of value. </li>
<li>Question why you&#8217;ve got a blog in the first place, and if the answer is &#8220;because we have to&#8221;, put someone else in charge. </li>
<li>Have enough guts to tell the Chief X Officer that they <em>just don&#8217;t get this stuff</em>. </li>
<li>Explain that always being in <em>sales mode</em><strong> </strong>doesn&#8217;t work in this medium. The company is not paying by the inch or the minute.</li>
<li>Challenge <strong>corporate insularity</strong>. Solicit contributions and feedback (positive and negative) from real people, and value it when you get it.</li>
<li>Explain the concept of <strong>institutional mistrust</strong> to the hand that feeds you.</li>
</ul>
<p><span>If you get fired for it, start a blog, tell your story, publish your cease-and-desist letters, get a publicist, and start a consulting firm.</span></p>
<p><span>Either way, <strong>you win</strong>.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/corporate-blogs-arent-trusted-forrester-research/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->