<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Agitationist &#187; facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agitationist.com/tag/facebook/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agitationist.com</link>
	<description>served irregularly for your edification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:25:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Explosive Growth of Twitter</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/the-explosive-growth-of-twitter</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/the-explosive-growth-of-twitter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul-crushing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon the 8000th time hearing that phrase, I think it&#8217;s time to put that into perspective:

That&#8217;s still a lot of people, no doubt. But it&#8217;s still a baby learning to crawl when compared to facebook, or even myspace. Hell, it&#8217;s not even as popular as friendster, which is apparently only still used by a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon the 8000th time hearing that phrase, I think it&#8217;s time to put that into perspective:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-613" title="facebook_vs_twitter" src="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/facebook_vs_twitter.gif" alt="" width="500" height="274" /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s still a lot of people, no doubt. But it&#8217;s still <strong>a baby learning to crawl</strong> when compared to facebook, or even myspace. Hell, it&#8217;s not even as popular as friendster, which is apparently only still used by a few people in the Phillipines.</p>
<p>But wait, you say &#8211; <em>Twitter has 14 million members</em>! Well then why is daily traffic only about a million? Well, for a start: 1) lots of those &#8220;members&#8221; aren&#8217;t real people, and 2) the proliferation of bots, spam, fake &#8220;marketing&#8221; tweets and just plain boring &#8220;what I had for lunch&#8221; updates are driving away real people in droves.</p>
<p>Am I going to predict Twitter&#8217;s death? No, not just yet. It&#8217;s too early in the disease cycle. But this is one very sick baby. And ugly, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/the-explosive-growth-of-twitter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Makes You Stupid, Twitter Makes You Dead Inside</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/facebook-makes-you-stupid-twitter-makes-you-dead-inside</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/facebook-makes-you-stupid-twitter-makes-you-dead-inside#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;or so say researchers, according to this article from The Register:
Fresh research from America confirms that online social networks are in fact playthings of the devil. Ohio profs say that use of Facebook leads to lower college grades, and others in California have found that Twitter gradually renders its users&#8217; moral compasses untrustworthy.
First up comes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or so say researchers, according to this article from <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04/14/facebook_twitter_users_dunces_amoral/" target="_blank">The Register</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: black;">Fresh research from America confirms that online social networks are in fact playthings of the devil. Ohio profs say that use of Facebook leads to lower college grades, and others in California have found that Twitter gradually renders its users&#8217; moral compasses untrustworthy.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">First up comes Aryn Karpinski of Ohio State Uni, with the news that Facebook users (at least those in her survey) are lazy, self-deluding thickies.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;There&#8217;s a disconnect between students&#8217; claim that Facebook use doesn&#8217;t impact their studies, and our finding showing they had lower grades and spent less time studying,&#8221; says Karpinski.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The PhD candidate collaborated with Adam Duberstein of Ohio Dominican Uni, surveying 219 students at Ohio State. These included 102 undergraduate students and 117 graduate students. Of the participants, 148 said they had a Facebook account. Some 85 percent of undergraduates were Facebook users, while only 52 percent of graduate students had accounts.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The Facebook users had grade point averages (GPAs) between 3.0 and 3.5 (in other words getting more Bs than As), while non-users averaged between 3.5 and 4.0 (more As than Bs)*.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Also, &#8220;students who spent more time working at paid jobs were less likely to use Facebook,&#8221; according to Ohio State.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;There may be other factors involved, such as personality traits, that link Facebook use and lower grades,&#8221; adds Karpinski, who doesn&#8217;t have a Facebook account herself.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;It may be that if it wasn&#8217;t for Facebook, some students would still find other ways to avoid studying, and would still get lower grades. But perhaps the lower GPAs could actually be because students are spending too much time socializing online.&#8221;</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Meanwhile, neuroscientists at the University of Southern California (USC) have suggested that too much use &#8220;rapid-fire media&#8221; &#8211; specifically, Twitter &#8211; &#8220;may confuse your moral compass&#8221;.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;Lasting compassion in relationship to psychological suffering requires a level of persistent, emotional attention,&#8221; says Manuel Castells, holder of the Wallis Annenberg Chair of Communication Technology and Society at USC.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">It seems that USC neuro-boffins hooked people up to brain monitoring gear and measured their responses to stories told in different ways about different subjects.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">According to the USC statement:</p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><em>The study raises questions about the emotional cost — particularly for the developing brain — of heavy reliance on a rapid stream of news snippets obtained through television, online feeds or social networks such as Twitter.</em></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;If things are happening too fast, you may not ever fully experience emotions about other people&#8217;s psychological states and that would have implications for your morality,&#8221; says Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, prof at USC&#8217;s Brain and Creativity Institute.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The USC researchers seem to suggest that learning things mainly through a constant stream of short, depersonalised info-nuggs will restrict a person&#8217;s ability to empathise with the people in the stories being told &#8211; to admire them, feel their pain or whatever.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Essentially, over-heavy Twitter use will make you cold, cynical and facile &#8211; ultimately leaving you heartless and dead inside.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">&#8220;Indifference to the vision of human suffering gradually sets in,&#8221; says Castells.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">There&#8217;s more from Ohio on Facebook making you thick/appealing primarily to lazy thickies <a rel="nofollow" href="http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/facebookusers.htm" target="_blank">here</a>, and from California on Twitter making you dead inside/appealing primarily to the facile and amoral <a rel="nofollow" href="http://uscnews.usc.edu/science_technology/nobler_instincts_take_time.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/facebook-makes-you-stupid-twitter-makes-you-dead-inside/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>150 Visitors a Day in 2 Weeks: the Bootstrap Method</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/150-visitors-a-day-in-2-weeks-the-bootstrap-method</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/150-visitors-a-day-in-2-weeks-the-bootstrap-method#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today is this blog&#8217;s 14th day in existence. Despite a couple of traffic-killing holidays in that period, I&#8217;m happy to report that, thanks to you, we&#8217;re now averaging 150 160 unique visitors a day, and the trend is upward. Since I&#8217;m just bootstrapping my way up, I thought I&#8217;d share what I did, what I didn&#8217;t, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today is this blog&#8217;s 14th day in existence. Despite a couple of traffic-killing holidays in that period, I&#8217;m happy to report that, thanks to you, we&#8217;re now averaging <strong><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">150</span></strong><strong> 160 unique visitors a day</strong>, and the trend is upward. Since I&#8217;m just bootstrapping my way up, I thought I&#8217;d share what I did, what I didn&#8217;t, and what I didn&#8217;t do but should have.</p>
<h3>What I did:</h3>
<p><strong>Concentrate on content.</strong> I&#8217;m writing about things that interest me, and hopefully others, not just trying to fill space. If you want to write just to get popular and make money&#8230;well, good luck. If you want to be <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=john+chow" target="_blank">John Chow</a>, go for it.</p>
<p><strong>Post consistently.</strong> I&#8217;m trying to stick to 5 days a day, Monday through Friday. That may become impossible, but I&#8217;ll try.</p>
<p><strong>Utilize every free service available.</strong> Google Analytics is pretty much mandatory (though it could use an averaging function). Submitting to Digg, Technorati, StumbleUpon &#8211; all free. StumbleUpon has given me half of my traffic the last few days.</p>
<p><strong>Establish communication</strong> <strong>with like-minded bloggers.</strong> <a href="http://learningseobasics.com/" target="_blank">Social Change SEO</a> is one I like a lot, as well as a few friends I&#8217;ve added to my links. I&#8217;m finding more all the time. Keep in mind, this is not a business transaction. I&#8217;d love a PR8 or PR9 linkback, but only from a site that makes sense, and certainly not by paying some scammer. </p>
<p><strong>Write link-bait.</strong> I backed into this technique when I wrote about <a href="http://agitationist.com/15-reasons-twitter-must-die">my hatred for Twitter</a> in my second post. I&#8217;ll be honest: at the time I was totally naive that people wrote controversial posts strictly to gain traffic. But when I saw people streaming in, I wrote a follow-up on more <a href="http://agitationist.com/1500-more-reasons-twitter-must-die">reasons Twitter sucks</a>. Hey, I ain&#8217;t stupid.</p>
<p><strong>Link to high-traffic blogs, when relevant</strong>. For example, the first line in my <a href="http://agitationist.com/2009-predictions-for-the-interweb">2009 predictions</a> post. Maybe I overdid it a little, but all of those sites received a ping that I linked to them, and some had an auto-trackback posted in their comments, which could lead a few people here. But remember, treat it like an nude scene: only do it if it&#8217;s integral to the plot.</p>
<p><strong>Comment on related posts</strong> <strong>elsewhere</strong>. Let others know that you&#8217;ve posted your take on a subject, but again, only if you can add something to the conversation. Don&#8217;t be a salesperson. Apply the normal rules of human engagement.</p>
<p><strong>Mention this blog on my social networks.</strong> Again, avoid salesmanship if you don&#8217;t want to be treated like one. These sites are there to let people know what you&#8217;re doing, and your blog is one of the things you&#8217;re doing.</p>
<p><strong>Tweak the meta-tags.</strong> At the very least, make sure you have an accurate description. This is something I slacked on until just yesterday.</p>
<h3>What I didn&#8217;t do:</h3>
<p><strong>Spam</strong><strong> other blogs</strong> with unrelated comments.</p>
<p>Participate in in <strong>dicey linking schemes</strong>.</p>
<p>Write anything I <strong>couldn&#8217;t live with</strong>.</p>
<p>Connect with anyone I <strong>wouldn&#8217;t have in real life</strong>.</p>
<h3>What I didn&#8217;t do but should have:</h3>
<p><strong>Ask for links.</strong> &#8221;You don&#8217;t ask, you don&#8217;t get&#8221;. I need to get better at this. I really prefer things happen organically, but I also hate waiting. Slight conflict there.</p>
<p><strong>Write a bunch of posts before launching,</strong> in order to &#8220;find my voice&#8221; first. I guess there&#8217;s nothing wrong with growing up in public, but this blog has just started to find itself in the last few days. It also would make regular posting easier if I had an archive I could pull one out of when I needed to.</p>
<p><strong>Make it pay for itself.</strong> Just yesterday I reluctantly placed an ad in the sidebar, which I can&#8217;t even see myself due to ad-blocking software. Hopefully you can. I can&#8217;t ask you to click on it, as that&#8217;s against Google&#8217;s policy. But I think I can mention that I make money if you do.</p>
<p>Clearly, I&#8217;m still struggling with how/whether I want to make money on this. If just one of you<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.midphase.com/newaff/redir.pl?a=0.916026225154386&amp;c=2&amp;creative=BannersANHostingTextLinksTextLink&amp;redirURL=" target="_blank"><strong>signs up with my web host</strong></a>, I&#8217;ll break even. I recommend it, isn&#8217;t that good enough?</p>
<p>No? OK then, scroll down on the sign-up page and enter coupon code &#8220;<strong>GOTAPEX-ROX-A-LOT</strong>&#8221; for 3 months free, free domain registration, and only $6.95 a month. What else do you want?</p>
<p>What did I say about avoiding salesmanship?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/150-visitors-a-day-in-2-weeks-the-bootstrap-method/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Predictions for the Interweb</title>
		<link>http://agitationist.com/2009-predictions-for-the-interweb</link>
		<comments>http://agitationist.com/2009-predictions-for-the-interweb#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Agitationist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[buzzwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkbait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neologisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oversharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agitationist.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



2009 is here, and the web is full of predictions for the year (see here, here, here, here, here, here and here).
However, many of these &#8220;leading thinkers&#8221; are frustratingly vague in their prognostications. &#8220;Facebook will continue to be popular&#8221; and &#8220;Twitter goes mainstream&#8221; do not qualify as bold predictions.
Unlike these &#8220;thought leaders&#8221;, I am willing to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right;"><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-8463505737346765";
/* 336x280, created 1/14/10 */
google_ad_slot = "7681744314";
google_ad_width = 336;
google_ad_height = 280;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div>
<p>2009 is here, and the web is full of predictions for the year (see <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2009_web_predictions.php" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2008/12/27/whats-on-tap-predictions-for-2009/" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.trendsspotting.com/blog/?p=544" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://www.it-director.com/enterprise/technology/news_release.php?rel=9006" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://boora.ca/blog/?p=2149" target="_blank">here</a>, <a href="http://davidwalsh.name/web-predictions-2009" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://howardlindzon.com/?p=3995" target="_blank">here</a>).</p>
<p>However, many of these &#8220;leading thinkers&#8221; are <strong>frustratingly vague</strong> in their prognostications. &#8220;Facebook will continue to be popular&#8221; and &#8220;Twitter goes mainstream&#8221; do <em>not</em> qualify as <strong>bold</strong> predictions.</p>
<p>Unlike these &#8220;thought leaders&#8221;, I am willing to go out on a limb for <em>you</em><em> the reader</em>, and come back with real specifics. Here then are <strong>the Agitationist&#8217;s </strong><strong>predictions for the web world in 2009</strong>:</p>
<h3>JANUARY</h3>
<p>&#8220;<strong>Identity aggregation</strong>&#8221; is the prevailing theme of 2009. This gains momentum throughout January, as Facebook acquires OpenID, FriendConnect and FriendFeed, and folds them into <strong>Facebook Connect</strong>, which will now be used to log on to all social networks, bank accounts, and porn sites.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_152" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-1.jpg"><span style="color: #99cc00;"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-152" title="tubes-1" src="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-1-150x150.jpg" alt="A series of tubes." width="150" height="150" /></span></a></dt>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><span style="color: #ff6600;"><strong><span style="color: #5767a8;"><span style="color: #ff8c00;">A series of tubes.</span></span></strong></span></em></p>
</dl>
</div>
<h3>FEBRUARY</h3>
<div>After being featured on an episode of &#8220;To Catch a Predator&#8221;, <strong>Twitter is overwhelmed</strong> with tens of millions of new users. Most of them are multiple profiles of social media marketers.</div>
<p>CPT (cost-per-tweet) becomes a primary advertising metric. Google buys Twitter for a record sum; Twitter admits this was its long-awaited &#8220;<strong>monetization plan</strong>&#8220;.</p>
<p>In February, someone claims to be a &#8220;<strong>Pro Twitterer</strong>&#8220;; there is no way to refute the claim.</p>
<h3>MARCH</h3>
<p>Microsoft products worldwide <strong>cease to function</strong> at 12:00am on March 1st 2009, as they fail to adjust to the non-leap year. A fix (code-named &#8220;Toaster&#8221;) is be scheduled to be released by July, but fails to materialize.</p>
<h3>APRIL</h3>
<p>After a fierce battle with Yahoo, <strong>Google acquires Facebook</strong>, and mashes up Facebook Connect with its own ID service OpenSocial (ironically using Yahoo Pipes). Google shuts down Orkut; no one is affected.</p>
<p>The triumphant Google launches a<strong> new social platform</strong>, connecting all your tweets, text messages, emails, bookmarks, contacts, comments, feeds, photos, calendars, status updates, and Wikipedia entries into one <strong>SocialID™</strong>.</p>
<p>Google then uses a proprietary algorithm to assign you a <strong>PeopleRank™</strong>, which determines your online authority, social status, earning potential and suitability for employment.</p>
<p>GFriends™ on your TrustList™ are able to follow your <strong>LifeFeed™</strong> and GoogleMap™ your real-world location (or &#8220;<a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;sll=37.062500,-95.677068&amp;sspn=23.875000,57.630033&amp;ei=Xf1gSfXWGIK4M_O1vIAN&amp;sig2=z1POITSuWYP66B4NRY7iag&amp;cd=1&amp;cid=42365748,-71183403,5783631704447606515&amp;li=lmd&amp;ll=42.383908,-71.179562&amp;spn=0.042223,0.071926&amp;z=14&amp;iwloc=A" target="_blank"><strong>meat-spot</strong></a>&#8220;), thanks to your SocialID™-enabled mobile device.</p>
<h3>MAY</h3>
<p>Controversy ensues when a whistle-blower claims the <strong>US government</strong> has covertly installed its own server room in the Googleplex to monitor private citizens&#8217; LifeFeeds™. However, this is widely seen as a necessary protection against terrorism, and a class-action lawsuit is quickly dismissed.</p>
<p><strong>Oversharing</strong> becomes expected social behavior, and the desire for privacy is seen as petty and prudish. Within three years, PeopleRank™ is planned to include fingerprints, SAT scores, credit reports, and criminal records.</p>
<p>&#8220;Identity theft&#8221; is replaced by the more serious crime of &#8220;<strong>Aggregated Identity Theft</strong>&#8220;, and companies compete to offer PeopleRank™ monitoring services for a monthly fee.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_153" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-2.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-153" title="tubes-2" src="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-2-150x150.jpg" alt="Another series of tubes." width="150" height="150" /></a></dt>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff8c00;"><em>Another series of tubes.</em></span></strong></p>
</dl>
</div>
<h3>JUNE</h3>
<p>A new phone is released that is so cool, it makes you think your phone sucks. You purchase this phone, but someone you know then gets a newer, <strong>cooler phone</strong>.</p>
<p>In late June, Oprah does a show on getting <strong>negative people</strong> out of your LifeFeed™.</p>
<h3>JULY</h3>
<p>With online identities consolidating rapidly, <strong>screen-name squatting</strong> becomes the domain-name squatting of 2009. Shaquille O&#8217;Neal buys the right to tweet under his own name for an undisclosed sum. After receiving a cease-and-desist letter, eBay shuts down an auction for the screen name &#8220;Beyoncé&#8221;. Diff&#8217;rent Strokes star Gary Coleman attempts to auction off his own name; the reserve price is not met.</p>
<h3>AUGUST</h3>
<p>Google is contracted to provide airport screening services for the TSA. President Obama defends this move as part of his &#8220;<strong>Google for Government</strong>&#8221; initiative.</p>
<p>However, there is a dark spot for Google in August, when it discovers that AdSense is nothing more than a massive <strong>pay-per-link scheme</strong>. Google penalizes itself by reducing its own PageRank from 10 to 0.</p>
<h3>SEPTEMBER</h3>
<p>Throughout the summer there has been a growing backlash against <strong>Google&#8217;s hegemony</strong>, and rebellious users begin moving to Yahoo.</p>
<p>However, there is a scandal in September, as a Yahoo employee leaves a briefcase containing Yahoo&#8217;s exclamation point in an airport lounge. Yahoo rapidly loses consumer trust and market share, and its stock price dives under $2.00. Microsoft succeeds in a <strong>hostile takeover</strong>, breaks up Yahoo and sells it for parts.</p>
<p>The exclamation point is found, and donated to the new &#8220;Web 1.0 Museum&#8221;, which opens in September on the campus of Stanford University, in a building shaped like a <strong>giant bubble</strong>.</p>
<div class="mceTemp">
<dl id="attachment_169" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 210px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-3.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-169" title="tubes-3" src="http://agitationist.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/tubes-3-150x150.png" alt="Yet another series of tubes." width="200" height="200" /></a></dt>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><em><span style="color: #ff8c00;">Yet another series of tubes</span></em></strong><span style="color: #ff8c00;">.</span></p>
</dl>
</div>
<h3>OCTOBER</h3>
<p>YouTube covers 75% of its video frame with advertising, adds pop-up balloons containing sponsored messages, and randomly replaces video soundtracks with jingles for the new YouTube-brand <strong>energy drink</strong>. Somehow, competitors still fail to gain significant market share.</p>
<h3>NOVEMBER</h3>
<p>NewsCorp buys the &#8220;Girls Gone Wild&#8221; franchise and folds it into <strong>MySpace</strong>, completing the site&#8217;s transition into the teen soft-porn market. Market share plummets, but <strong>profits skyrocket</strong>.</p>
<p>There is controversy when it is revealed that MySpace&#8217;s &#8220;Tom&#8221; has been dead for several years, and his profile is being operated by a low-paid employee in Bangalore. &#8220;Tom&#8221; is <strong>de-friended</strong> by 2.5 million people in one day, a Guinness world record in this newly-created category.</p>
<h3>DECEMBER</h3>
<p>Predictions for the year are reviewed, and found to be either <strong>eerily accurate</strong> or<strong> totally off-base</strong>.</p>
<p><em>&#8211;FIN&#8211;</em></p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-8463505737346765";
/* Agit inpost 2 */
google_ad_slot = "4411666264";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script><br />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agitationist.com/2009-predictions-for-the-interweb/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
