Blogging, SEO, web trends, google keywords and other geeky stuff.

1500 More Reasons Twitter Must Die

Posted: December 29th, 2008 | Author: Agitationist | Filed under: buzzwords, tools | Tags: , , , , , , | 10 Comments »

In a previous post titles “15 Reasons Twitter Must Die“, I accused Twitter users of oversharing the petty, mundane details of their sad, pointless lives. 

Incensed Twitterers jumped to its defense. Twitter was a useful tool, they said, and wasn’t just reducing conversation to idle noise. It could be used for sharing ideas, networking, and gauging the zeitgeist.

Thinking I might have been a bit hard on the Twittersphere, I thought I’d revisit the issue. Using the much-celebrated (though hardly revolutionary) search technology recently added to Twitter, I set out to see just how illuminating the average Tweet was.

The idea that Twitter seemed to frequently be a report on what the user was having for lunch seemed to particularly gall the Twitterers who wrote in. So let’s see how many tweets in the last 24 hours concerned the topic of “lunch”.

Off we go.

Well it appears we’ve found the limit of Twitter search: 1500 results. And in the time it took to write that sentence, 16 more results were added.

Keep in mind that as I write this, it is 8:00 am Central Time, which means that unless Greenland is taking an early break, it is not lunch hour in any populated area on Earth. 

Just a few sample results:

technobohemiaPlaying WOW, but craving Chinese food…when will it be lunchtime?
half a minute ago
SamShepherdwent to M&S to get lunch and came back with sushi. I’ve never eaten sushi. don’t know what inspired that
1 minute ago
dihsjpwaiting for lunch
2 minutes ago
qwghlmRight, feeling vaguely progressive and have tidied the living room. Now for lunch
2 minutes ago
Rebecca_Agralunch
4 minutes ago
einerleiback to library…finally, after having a nice lunch with a friend
4 minutes ago
WehtamBack home in sunny Manchester. Off to cash checks after lunch.
4 minutes ago
mauricio_kimuraHungry and ready to go for lunch !!!
5 minutes ago
timwastedhaving some lunch and watching bad tv – but at least its warm inside
6 minutes ago
Jedbeck2 hours til lunch with my girls
6 minutes ago
Knickiis going to skin some potatos for lunch.
8 minutes ago
eburgosgarciaback from lunch & hairdresser..
9 minutes ago
[Incidentally, that last one was a gentleman. Do men generally refer to their "hairdresser" where you come from?]

The disturbing tendency here is toward externalizing what should remain, in a reasonably civilized society, the inner monologue. This is partly the medium’s fault for restricting itself to 140 characters. Even Oscar Wilde would have a hard time coming up with 20 pithy quips a day under those conditions.

Now, to make this experiment somewhat scientific, we need a control phrase.  If “lunch” brings up a list of 1500 mundane tweets that no one needs to see, what word or phrase will reveal the intelligent, illuminating, useful tweets I keep hearing about?

This where you come in. Please make your suggestions in the comments, and if I don’t hear from you, have a great lunch.

Bookmark and Share

How to Get a One Word Domain Name

Posted: December 24th, 2008 | Author: Agitationist | Filed under: blogging, domains | Tags: , , , , | 2 Comments »

All the one word domain names are gone.

After an hour or two of searching, you’ve come to that conclusion. There is no meaningful English word that hasn’t already been registered.

Well, you’re right. Give up now.

Unless you can embrace the concept of nonsense. In which case, great one word names are right there, waiting for you to pluck them off the tree. They’re screaming at you: “Pick me! Pick me!”

First of we’re assuming that the generic names for your project (let’s say shoes.com and shoes.net) are already taken. If not, buy them, and then please buy me a lottery ticket.

OK, now that we’re back in the real world, how about zazzer.com? Blastora? Quiklit?

“But, but, but…those don’t mean anything!” you protest. Stick with me here.

Take a look at this list of recent startups. Most of them look like the product of a child on Ritalin with a bowl of alphabet soup. WakoopaTwinglyHoeraZilokSymbaloo? If those names don’t immediately lower your IQ, at least they should make you feel a whole lot better about your ideas.

Yes, they’re meaningless, but only because they don’t mean anything yet. If you believe it’s a word, it is a word. After all, language is only language because we collectively agree on its meaning.

So when is a name a name? When people recognize it. If I want to be called Zorak, I just need you to call me Zorak. Likewise, if we all say Flickr is spelled without an “e”, well then it is. Post-Flickr, dropping the final vowel quickly became a formula: Tumblr, Raptr, Feedalizr (Twitter didn’t get the memo). Success is always imitated, formulized, and then clichéd. But someone has to jump first.

If it expresses something, evokes something or just sounds good to your ear, then it works.

Likewise, if we believe that a name-number compound makes sense, it does. Especially with a meaningful or witty backstory. 30gms.com is the web site of a firm called Fibre, of which 30 grams happens to be the recommended dose. Clever, huh?

Although that number-noun formula is overused at this point, it demonstrates a key naming principle of our time: enigma is the new familiarity. Names like “Thunderbird” and “Zenith” were supposed to imbue products with the qualities of their namesakes. Those days are gone. Names no longer define products; products define their names.

And although shoes.com may have automatic traffic for life, zapatoo.com or 12toes.com are more memorable and more brandable. When the brain hears something unique that it doesn’t quite understand, it latches on and won’t let go.

After all, branding is differentiation. And isn’t nonsense is about as different as it gets?

Bookmark and Share